Bother tabs

You can make it so more tabs will stack before they start scrolling:Go to the about config page and change this one variable:about:configbrowser.tabs.tabMinWidth 1Makes it so tabs can be the minimum viable width before forcing scrolling on. On a 2560x1440 monitor, you can fit more than 40 tabs before scroll kicks in. #12 What the fuck? How many tabs do people keep open? 5-6 max for me lol. #13 I definitely have my Firefox set up this way (basically the smallest a tab can get with my setup is the favicon plus one letter of the title, lol) but I'm not sure if I did anything beyond the tabMinWidth trick to make it so. Given the mentions of CSS above, it's probably worth mentioning that I also use this Firefox CSS package to tweak the UI:It's a moot point for me anyways because even at that size, I have way more tabs than can fit in the title bar so it scrolls anyways. It doesn't really bother me though. #14 You can make it so more tabs will stack before they start scrolling:Go to the about config page and change this one variable:about:configbrowser.tabs.tabMinWidth 1Makes it so tabs can be the minimum viable width before forcing scrolling on. On a 2560x1440 monitor, you can fit more than 40 tabs before scroll kicks in. This has never worked for me. Regardless of what value I set. the Tab scrolling always begins after 10 or so. Carbon Deploying the stealth Cruise Missile #15 This has never worked for me. Regardless of what value I set. the Tab scrolling always begins after 10 or so. Huh, weird. I wonder if it only works on certain themes?I do run the throwback photon theme, maybe that one still works, but the new one either uses a

Need multiple tabs and fast browsing, but when I needed to research something and access multiple tabs and fast browsing on ipad - Opera was the browser. #17 Putting the 'default browser' argument aside, doesn't it bother anyone that 3rd party browsers cannot use Safari's superior Nitro JavaScript engine, and instead have to resort to using WebKit's (slower) engine? This has been one of the top things that bugged me about Apple's policy regarding 3rd party browsers.More on it here: I don't see any difference in speed regardless of whether I use Chrome/Safari/Opera on iOS. The only reason I tend to stick to Safari is because of other browser's weird design choices, such as Chrome's swiping from the sides of the screen changing tabs instead of how it functions on iOS Safari and OS X Safari/Chrome/Firefox/etc. Besides, JavaScript has always been the "slow" option, regardless of how much faster it looks now on paper. Nitro or no.This isn't 100% relevant to the topic, but you may find this worth a read: #18 I'm curious: why does Opera exist? What do they get out of producing a web browser that virtually no one uses? They don't charge for it, and they can't use it to exert control on web standards using it... So why bother? Why does any company exist?Opera has 300+ million active browser users and is one of the major mobile browsers, so you shouldn't worry about that. But even if Opera did have few users, so what? Why can't someone make a browser if they want to? #19 No company should ever 'stick to their roots'. It didn't work for blackberry, or Nokia, or Atari, or Kodak.Apple ignored this advice and made the iPod. Clearly 'adapt or die', or 'innovate' would be much better corporate advice. Lolno. The iPod did what Apple did best. It stuck to easy to use principles with good design. It stuck to its roots.What Blackberry, nokia, atari, and kodak all did was release new products that strayed from the company DNA. Blackberry released ****** phones, Nokia released confusing phones, atari released computers you couldn't game on - and consoles you couldn't compute on, and kodak released terrible cameras. They didn't stick to their roots. Thats for arguing for me, though. #20 Lolno. The iPod did what Apple did best. It stuck to easy to use principles with good design. It stuck to its roots.What Blackberry, nokia, atari, and kodak all did was release new products that strayed from the company DNA. Blackberry released ****** phones, Nokia released confusing phones, atari released computers you couldn't game on - and consoles you couldn't compute on, and kodak released terrible cameras. They didn't stick to their

Nintendo consoles, some smart televisions, Adobe's Creative Suite etc. Opera was used in Nintendo consoles. It isn't in their current systems. And, from what I can tell, Adobe ceased to use it after CS4. C DM macrumors Sandy Bridge #13 Putting the 'default browser' argument aside, doesn't it bother anyone that 3rd party browsers cannot use Safari's superior Nitro JavaScript engine, and instead have to resort to using WebKit's (slower) engine? This has been one of the top things that bugged me about Apple's policy regarding 3rd party browsers.More on it here: sandboxing and all that.---------- Opera was used in Nintendo consoles. It isn't in their current systems. And, from what I can tell, Adobe ceased to use it after CS4. Perhaps as far as an actual Opera browser itself, but maybe not necessarily the technology behind whatever browser or browser components those products/companies (as well as others) use? #14 I'm curious: why does Opera exist? What do they get out of producing a web browser that virtually no one uses? They don't charge for it, and they can't use it to exert control on web standards using it... So why bother? Opera exists for people like me. I've been using Opera's desktop browser for over 15 years and have no desire to change any time soon. All other browsers feel like a step back in terms of usability to me. That said, I'm sticking with Opera 12.16 as long as I can. They removed many features starting with version 15 and newer. These versions, like Safari, Chrome, Fire Fox, etc. are basiically unusable and very frustrating. C DM macrumors Sandy Bridge #15 Opera exists for people like me. I've been using Opera's desktop browser for over 15 years and have no desire to change any time soon. All other browsers feel like a step back in terms of usability to me. That said, I'm sticking with Opera 12.16 as long as I can. They removed many features starting with version 15 and newer. These versions, like Safari, Chrome, Fire Fox, etc. are basiically unusable and very frustrating. Out of curiosity, why/how are they "unusable and very frustrating"? #16 I'm curious: why does Opera exist? As I said before on forums I think Opera was the only browser on iphone and ipad, capable to have 10x more simultaneous tabs, no reloading and instant back and forward. I once loaded 17 tabs on ipad 1. While Safari probably could load max 2 or 3 without reloading. My question for you and others, how come not more people used Opera ? I used it rarely and mostly used Safari because on wifi it was fast and most of the time I didn't